Saturday, February 28, 2009

The 10 Big Lies About America


I finished this after "American Lion", the first Michael Medved book I've read all the way through in some time.

As is always the case with Medved the read is easy, the information is explosive.

Going through the pages I already knew much of what he was writing about through my reading and studies, but not to such a deep extent.

Also there were little memories popping into my head that I had learned much of this when I was a kid.

Over the course of time, especially by the end of high school and through the education process, everything was flipped on its head. America was an evil place, full slave owning, gun-toting, Christian, hypocrites.
If that sounds cliched it is. The repeated mantra of America being less than exceptional, less than the last best hope for mankind as Lincoln said, has become cliched.

As short a time as it was, and so so so long ago, I do have blessed memories of being taught the greatness of America and being instilled with a love of country.

This book brings much of that back to the surface...if you are as old as me. If you are younger or have children needing to hear something other than the cliches of America is not all its cracked up to be, that it should be more like Sweden or France, or that it needs to regain its credibility around the world...this is the book to read and to have your kids read. Particularly Big Lie #4

Thursday, February 26, 2009

American Lion


Recently completed "American Lion" which covered Andrew Jackson's years in the White House.
I have to admit that while I have long been a fan of American History I have neglected the Jacksonian era...This book covers a multitude of sins in that department. An excellent book, and an even better read.
Particularly interesting was the insight into Jackson's actions in regards to Indian removal ("Trail of Tears") and dealings with the National Bank.
The broad brush charactizations of purely racial motivations as taught to all of us in school come under fire when you discover Jackson's complexity as a whole and not the slanted villan some would make him.
In regards to his battle with the National Bank, see todays headlines...Start with Calvin Coolidge and work your way back to Washington and every president would have pains, anxiety, and eventual heart attacks over what our government is doing today. Jackson's evil empire wasn't the Soviet Union, he viewed it as being the National Bank which had the power to build and destroy at its own pleasure and felt answerable to nobody...kinda sorta like our government in total today...
Read the book...

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

New home of "The Mid Valley Sports Show"

Click on the link below and it will take you to the new Mid Valley Sports website
www.midvalleysports.com

Next Tuesday night our special guest will be Rosemead coach Matt Koffler

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Is it Arroyo Time Again?

Does it seem that the power in the MVL is shifting back to Arroyo?

The South El Monte tide has crested, Mead has had a nice run, El Monte returns only eight players, and Gabrielino hasn't been heard from since 2004.

Tough to argue against 18 returning starters, especially when you see all the talent going out the door at Rose, EM, and SEM.

(Read "Football Around the Mid" at http://www.midvalleynewsonline.com/)

One player that may be flying under the radar in the area is Knight running back Mike Vasquez...

Is there a team in the Mission Valley ready to knock heads with Arroyo right now?

Should I Be interested...?

Is it just me or are you also tired of the steroid question in baseball?
So Alex Rodriguez got popped for using roids back in 2003...I just don't care.

The subject is played out...if you want to talk high school athletes using that stuff then you have a story...but a world class athlete on roids, caught slurping on a bong, arrested for carrying a gun under his car seat,...its played out.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Fanview 2/10/09

By Joe Torosian

“Devin, I've led a soldier's life, and I've never seen anything as brutally clear as this.”
--- Gen. John Buford

Big word for the day; “Paradigm”

Money changes things.

A lot of money makes life good. A lot of money can take you from making soup at five in the morning, to three month long vacations, multiple homes, and vicious fights over inheritance.

A lack of money can leave you buried in debt, slaving for “the man”, and looking like the Los Angeles Times these days.

I’m about to say something apocalyptic, I’m going to call for a shift, change, or destruction of a century old paradigm.

Dump high school sports.

(Say What!)

I say dump high school sports. Dump them now, dump them before they become so hollowed out and soulless that they start to look like Keith Richards.

Money is short, athletics cost money, dump them.

Think about the dough. You don’t have to pay for coaches, equipment, transportation, or insurance.

No more chasing the best players around the campus to make sure they get to class and pass their next biology exam.

No more prima-donna coaches bullying the administration for more of this and more of that.

No more of the business of education being linked with the parks and rec. It will be all about books, learning the three R’s, and achieving higher test scores.

Of course this big of a paradigm shift might mean a few people in high places could be left out on the bread line or signing up to sell Amway.

But what of it? As my half-breed friend from Vulcan once said; “The needs of the many out weigh the needs of the few.”

This means no more cheerleading. No more drill. No more short flags, or tall flags, no more pep, song, spirit, or band.

No more clubs. Nada.

This would save a ton of bread.

Unfortunately for the paradigm shift, because of the cluelessness of the federal government, no matter who is in power, the same amount of money will still keep getting pumped into the system.

The same corruption, the same cronyism, the same quid pro quo, would all still be in place.

And we would still hear the same cries about there not being enough money coming from school districts and the states.

So what would change?

How about the freeing up of prep sports from all the chains of the school system? You wouldn’t have to hear about money and grades.

Why couldn’t a community charter its own football team made up of prep age players?

Why couldn’t they run it like a business, which would require each community to put out the best product it could for success.

Let companies, private business, sponsor the local football team and succeed or fail on its own merits.

A lack of effort, a lack of competence, and fine, no player or his family is bound any longer by a school district.

Keep the players in the same set up. Let them compete for four years and graduate them out.

Let the business’s open college trusts for each of the players and deposit a small sum, from the revenue earned, to collect over the four year period.

Form leagues, have playoffs, declare a champion. Promote it to the communities and keep school districts, state and federal control out of the loop.

Yeah, I like that idea.

I can hear my recently departed friend Mr. Roarke telling me; “Welcome to Fantasy Island.”

However, I don’t think he would be mocking the idea. I think what he would really mock is the idea that the school districts, the state, or the federal government would ever give up control.

Once the feds are in they are harder to evict than your unemployed uncle who can’t seem to find a job, swills too much beer, has never had a girlfriend, and is always willing to offer financial advice.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Transfer of Wealth?

Old thoughts come back to the forefront. Not only is it the season for the coming and going of coaches, but also the time for players to transfer out.

The departure of South El Monte's Neiko Padilla to South Hills hurts the Eagles and whoever the new coach is going to be.

I stick it to John Scanlan as often as I can over politics, moneyball, and Juan Pierre...but I like his argument about high school sports being about the experience...and I'm not looking to start an argument but we have catered so much to the whims and emotions of individuals and groups over the last few years what sensible argument can be made against a football player wanting to transfer?

(Tim Peterson's story on Neiko Padilla can be found at http://www.midvalleynewsonline.com/)

Padilla's transfer has been smoothed by a convenient address, but what if there wasn't an address? How strong can the argument be? How do you keep the playing field level between private and public schools?

Let's try another argument...should anyone stand in the way of a Temple City football player wanting to leave and play someplace else? The departure of EVERY COACH associated with last season's semifinals appearance has this program going south.

I so hope to be proven wrong, but the chances of landing a quality coach are diminishing with each passing day and word is spreading about a football program in crisis: "What is going on with that administration?" is the phrase coming back to me.

Should any of those talented players be allowed to transfer out? I understand the experience of high school sports...but bad coaching, young coaching, coaches not ready for such a position pose not only potential for a bad experience but a dangerous one.
What do you think?